What are the common misconceptions about apprenticeships – particularly within the architecture industry, where traditional routes of education are so deeply rooted?
For National Apprenticeship Week 2025, We asked current Corstorphine & Wright apprentices aB Mukadam and Izem Celik to reflect on their own, and others, preconceptions about apprenticeships, how these views have evolved as they enter their second year, and how their experiences compared with their initial expectations.
What was your impression of apprenticeships before you started your programme?
Izem: Before starting my apprenticeship, I viewed it as a compelling alternative to the traditional university route, offering a practical, hands-on approach to learning.
What appealed to me most was the chance to gain real-world experience while continuing my academic development. This integration of practice and education offered a clear and practical route to advancing my career.
AB: From the research I had carried out, to me, apprenticeships seemed like the best way to further my architectural education while gaining real-world industry experience. However, I was initially concerned about balancing work and study commitments simultaneously, as well as the potential sacrifice of much of my personal time.
Did anyone close to you have any thoughts or misconceptions?
Izem: Some of my friends and family initially questioned whether an apprenticeship could provide the same depth of knowledge and career prospects as a traditional degree, while also raising concerns about balancing work, study, and personal life.
AB: My friends, including those within the industry, thought that I would need to take a pay cut or even work for free during the apprenticeship. However, this is not the case. Apprenticeships are fully funded by the government and employers, providing a cost-effective way to further education while gaining invaluable industry experience.
With hindsight, what was your biggest misconception?
Izem: Initially, I was concerned about managing the dual demands of university and work. I initially feared that balancing both would be overwhelming and that the intensity of either could impede my progress.
Now, as I enter my second year, I’ve come to realize that while the workload is significant, it’s entirely manageable with effective planning and time management. What once seemed like a challenge has proven to be one of the programme’s greatest strengths. This synergy has made my contributions in both academic and professional settings more impactful and refined.
AB: Looking back, my biggest misconception was the challenge of managing my time effectively. However, the course is structured to provide apprentices with dedicated time away from the office to focus on university work, supported by a combination of fixed and flexible scheduling.
How has your experience so far been compared to what you expected?
Izem: I am incredibly grateful to have chosen this pathway, as the experience has far exceeded my expectations in countless ways. Despite my initial concerns, the unwavering support from my workplace has been instrumental in my growth, offering invaluable opportunities to apply what I’ve learned. The synergy between the programme and my professional environment has made this journey both fulfilling and rewarding.
AB: My experience has exceeded my expectations in many ways. I thought it would be tough balancing work and study, but the course is well-structured, and I’ve received a lot of support from both my employer and university. I’ve also been very fortunate to receive my education from industry leaders, adding to my growing knowledge & network within the industry.
Izem: I am particularly thankful to my directors, Rav Kumar and Tony Mead, my mentor Joanna Holland, and the course convenor, Timothée Brittain-Catlin, for their consistent support and guidance. Their encouragement has been pivotal in helping me thrive and make the most of this unique opportunity.
